Battle of the Lenses: vivo V50 vs OPPO Reno13 vs Samsung A56 – A Detailed Comparison

Main Image
  • Like
  • Comment
  • Share

With smartphone photography evolving rapidly, mid-range devices are now pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Among the top contenders in the ₹35,000 to ₹45,000 segment, the vivo V50, OPPO Reno13, and Samsung Galaxy A56 stand out for their high-megapixel sensors, AI-driven enhancements, and versatile camera setups. The vivo V50 even boasts ZEISS imaging, promising flagship-grade photography.

But do these devices live up to their claims in real-world usage? To answer that, we’re putting their cameras to the test—covering portraits, macros, selfies, night photography, and more. Whether you’re a mobile photography enthusiast or just looking for the best camera phone under Rs 45,000, this in-depth comparison will help you decide. Let’s dive in! 

vivo V50 vs. OPPO Reno13 vs. Samsung Galaxy A56 Camera Specs

vivo V50 vs. OPPO Reno13 vs. Samsung Galaxy A56 Camera Specs

Before we dive into the full comparison, let’s take a closer look at the camera specifications of each device:

vivo V50

  • Main Camera: 50 MP ZEISS main camera with OIS, 1/1.55-inch, f/1.9, PDAF, 23mm, 4K30
  • Ultra-wide Camera: 50 MP ZEISS sensor, 1/2.76-inch, f/2.0, AF, 15mm, 4K30
  • Group Selfie Camera: 50 MP ZEISS sensor, 1/2.76-inch, f/2.0, AF, 21mm, 4K30

OPPO Reno13

  • Main Camera: 50 MP sensor with OIS, 1/1.95-inch, f/1.8, PDAF, 26mm, 4K30
  • Ultra-wide Camera: 8 MP sensor, 1/4-inch, f/2.2, AF, 15mm, 1080p30
  • Selfie Camera: 50 MP sensor, 1/2.75-inch, f/2.0, AF, 21mm, 4K30

Samsung Galaxy A56

  • Main Camera: 50 MP sensor with OIS, 1/1.56-inch, f/1.8, PDAF, 26mm, 4K30
  • Ultra-wide Camera: 12 MP sensor, 1/3.06-inch, f/2.2, FF, 13mm, 4K30
  • Macro Camera: 5 MP sensor, f/2.4, FF
  • Selfie Camera: 12 MP sensor, 1/2.8-inch, f/2.2, FF, 21mm, 4K30

On paper, the vivo V50 leads with superior hardware and ZEISS imaging—larger sensors, AF, and consistent 4K30 across all lenses. The OPPO Reno13 follows with a strong (but smaller) main and selfie setup but a weaker ultra-wide. The Galaxy A56 trails with modest ultra-wide and selfie with no AF, plus a basic macro with FF.

vivo V50’s ZEISS Magic

The vivo V50 sets itself apart from the other two phones with its exclusive, flagship-inspired features, found on the vivo X200 series. Its ZEISS Multifocal Portrait System offers three focal lengths—23mm, 35mm, and 50mm.

You also get seven unique ZEISS Bokeh Styles (Sonnar, Planar, Flare, Cinematic, B-Speed, Distagon, and Biotar) to choose from, delivering professional-grade portraits with customizable, DSLR-like depth and artistic background blur.

The India-exclusive Wedding Portrait Mode enhances wedding photography with preset color styles like Prosecco, Neo Retro, and Pastel, smart lighting adjustments, and a Color-Adaptive Border that complements traditional attire. 

Now, let’s dive into the comparison.

vivo V50 vs. OPPO Reno13 vs. Samsung Galaxy A56 Camera Comparison: Main Camera

Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 1X

The vivo V50’s 50 MP ZEISS main camera excels in both 1X and 2X shots, delivering outstanding color consistency, vibrant yet pleasing tones, and crisp details with minimal oversharpening, even in the hazy urban landscape. Its ZEISS optics and larger sensor size ensure superior dynamic range, preserving highlights and shadows effectively.

The OPPO Reno13’s 50 MP main camera offers good color accuracy but shows slightly muted tones and less sharpness in 2X shots, with some loss of detail in shadows.

2X shot from the vivo V50- Reno13- A56
Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 2X

The Samsung Galaxy A56’s 50 MP main camera performs well with balanced colors but struggles with oversharpening in high-contrast areas and lacks the vivo’s richness in color depth.

Overall, the vivo V50 stands out for its superior image quality, making it the top choice for main camera photography.

Ultra-wide Camera

The vivo V50’s 50 MP ZEISS ultra-wide camera delivers exceptional detail and vibrant colors, with minimal oversharpening and well-preserved highlights, making it ideal for capturing expansive scenes with clarity. The OPPO Reno13’s 8 MP ultra-wide shows decent performance but struggles with lower resolution and softer details.

Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 uw
Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 ultra-wide shot

The Samsung Galaxy A56’s 12 MP ultra-wide offers solid color accuracy but lacks the sharpness and dynamic range of the vivo, with some noticeable oversharpening in high-contrast areas. Overall, the vivo V50 stands out, making it the top choice for ultra-wide photography among the three. It’s also the only ultra-wide camera with auto-focus.

Portrait Mode

The vivo V50 redefines portrait photography with its ZEISS multifocal system, dominating at 23mm, 35mm, and 50mm focal lengths with sharp edge detection and seamless detail retention. The images below showcase ZEISS signatures—a solid evidence of its portrait mastery.

It’s seven ZEISS Bokeh Styles (Sonnar, Planar, Flare, Cinematic, B-Speed, Distagon, and Biotar) deliver stunning depth with creamy, customizable background blur, enhancing the artistic appeal—ideal for wedding photography and styles—while maintaining rich, consistent skin tones and vibrant colors.

Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56
Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 1X portrait

The OPPO Reno13’s portrait mode provides solid edge detection but struggles with slightly harsher bokeh transitions and less depth, with skin tones appearing slightly muted and oversharpening applied on the facial details.

The Samsung Galaxy A56’s portrait, while capable, shows less precise edge detection, especially at 2X digital crop, and its bokeh lacks the smoothness and variety of the vivo, with flatter tones.

Left to right: vivo 50/Galaxy A56
Left to right: vivo 50/Galaxy A56 2X portrait

In these images, the vivo V50 captures the subject’s contemplative pose on the floral couch with remarkable clarity, vibrant colors, and a professional bokeh effect, making it the standout choice for portrait photography. You can also check out the various bokeh effects available below.

Macro Photography

The vivo V50 features a 50 MP ZEISS ultra-wide camera (1/2.76-inch, f/2.0, 15mm) that doubles as a macro camera, cropping to 26mm for close-up shots, offering exceptional resolution and autofocus for sharp, detailed imaging.

The OPPO Reno13’s 8 MP ultra-wide (1/4-inch, f/2.2, 15mm) doubles as a macro but is limited by resolution, sensor size, and aperture. The Galaxy A56’s 5 MP macro (f/2.4, fixed focus) lacks autofocus and struggles with detail.

Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56
Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 macro shot

The vivo V50’s macro shots, as you can see in LEGO model and the pink rose, showcase remarkable detail and depth, capturing intricate textures—like the LEGO’s small components and the rose’s petal layers—with vibrant colors and minimal noise, even at close range.

Its larger 50 MP sensor ensures a closer look and superior sharpness, outshining the other two phones. The OPPO Reno13’s 8 MP macro images show reasonable detail but lack the vivo’s depth and clarity, with softer edges and less vibrant colors. The rose petals lack any detail at all as the Reno13 simply could not get that close.

Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56
Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 macro shot

The Samsung Galaxy A56’s 5 MP macro shots, while capturing the subjects, suffer from fixed focus limitations (check the LEGO shot), resulting in blurred edges and less detail. So, despite the A56 having a dedicated camera for macro, the vivo V50 leaps ahead, thanks to the ultra-wide camera doubling as a macro shooter too. The vivo V50 takes a clear win for macro photography.

Selfies

The vivo V50’s 50 MP ZEISS Group Selfie camera (1/2.76-inch, f/2.0, 21mm, AF) delivers exceptional selfie performance, capturing sharp details in the subject’s facial features, beard, and sweater texture, with vibrant, natural skin tones and minimal noise, even under bright outdoor lighting.

Its autofocus and larger sensor size ensure excellent depth and clarity, making it ideal for group selfies or individual shots, as seen in the image with the subject and vehicle. Also, you can zoom in up to 2X by pinching in to get super close with the selfies when you want to.

Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56
Left to right: vivo 50/Reno13/Galaxy A56 selfie

The OPPO Reno13’s 50 MP selfie camera (1/2.75-inch, f/2.0, 21mm, AF) is no slouch either. It offers good detail and color accuracy but shows slightly softer edges and less vibrant tones, with some noticeable oversharpening but not too much.

The Samsung Galaxy A56’s 12 MP selfie camera (1/2.8-inch, f/2.2, 21mm, FF) performs adequately but lacks the vivo’s detail and depth due to its fixed focus and smaller sensor, resulting in flatter skin tones and less crispness, particularly in the subject’s facial hair and clothing texture.

The vivo V50 also features AI 3D Studio Lighting 2.0 which helps remove backlight haze and add adaptive lighting to make your selfies standout. Overall, the vivo V50 stands out for its superior clarity and color consistency, making it the top choice for selfies.

Conclusion

After a thorough comparison of the vivo V50, OPPO Reno13, and Samsung Galaxy A56 cameras across various scenarios—main, ultra-wide, portrait, macro, and selfies—the vivo V50 emerges as the clear winner in this mid-range price bracket (₹35,000–₹45,000).

Its superior hardware, including a larger 50 MP ZEISS all main camera system with autofocus and OIS delivers exceptional detail, vibrant colors, and consistent image quality, particularly excelling in the ZEISS multifocal portrait mode with its seven ZEISS Bokeh Styles and Wedding Style Portraits.

It also takes great macros with its ultra-wide doubling as a macro. The OPPO Reno13 performs well but falls short with its lower-resolution ultra-wide and less dynamic portraits, while the Samsung Galaxy A56 lags due to fixed-focus limitations and smaller sensors, especially in selfies and macros. For the best all-around photography, the vivo V50 stands out as the top choice.

Pricing

When it comes to pricing, the vivo V50 starts at ₹34,999 for the 8/128 GB variant, going up to ₹40,999 for 12/512 GB. The OPPO Reno13 sits slightly higher, starting at ₹37,999 for 8/128 GB, while the Samsung Galaxy A56 is the priciest, beginning at ₹41,999 and going up to ₹47,999 for the 12/256 GB model. This makes the vivo V50 the most budget-friendly option while still delivering the best camera performance.

You can follow Smartprix on TwitterFacebook and Google News. Visit smartprix.com for the latest tech and auto newsreviews, and guides.

Brand StoryBrand Story
Our Brand Stories are bespoke sponsored narratives, created in collaboration with select partners to artfully express each brand’s unique perspective.

Related Articles

ImageSaare Jahan Se Accha Trailer Released: Here’s When this Espionage Thriller will Stream on OTT

The espionage thriller series featuring Pratik Gandhi has officially announced its premiere date. The creators of Saare Jahan Se Accha recently released a video in which the lead actor reveals the release date of the drama series. They have selected an ideal occasion for this announcement, scheduling the series to debut in just a month. …

ImageOppo Reno 14 vs. vivo V50 vs. Galaxy A36: Which Mid-Range 5G Handset Is Right For You?

If you’re in the market for a mid-range handset that neither drills a hole in your wallet nor cuts corners on essential (and some good-to-have) features, we have three hot options for you: the newly launched Reno 14, the vivo V50, and the Galaxy A36. While all three phones offer 5G connectivity (that’s sort of …

ImageExynos 2500 vs. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Dimensity 9400: The Flagship Processors Comparison

In the fiercely competitive world of mobile chipsets, the battle for supremacy continues to rage. While we’ve seen multiple flagships featuring the Snapdragon 8 Elite and the Dimensity 9400 (both of which perform well), a new contender has entered the market: the Samsung Exynos 2500. While each of these chipsets is based on 3nm fabrication …

ImageOppo Find X8 vs. vivo X200: Battle of Dimensity 9400-powered Flagships

The Chinese consumer tech giants Oppo and vivo have launched their latest flagship smartphone series: the Find X8 and the vivo X200 lineup. While the former consists of two models, the latter has three models (two regular-sized smartphones and one ‘mini’ variant). However, today’s comparison will focus on the specifications of the baseline models: the …

ImageOnePlus 13s vs vivo X200 FE Camera Comparison: Which One Takes Better Photos?

Today, we are comparing two compact smartphones, the OnePlus 13s and the vivo X200 FE. Both are priced at ₹55,000, and both target users looking for powerful cameras in a smaller form factor. However, the difference lies in the camera hardware and processing. On paper, both have the same size main sensor, which is 1/1.56 …

Discuss

52 Comments
Mohit Bansal
Mohit Bansal
@mohit_yiyejugo
5 months ago

Can anyone share their experience with the macro lens? Does it capture fine details effectively?

Reply
Suraj Gandhi
Suraj Gandhi
@suraj_nugacisu
4 months ago

Yes, quite good

Sai Sreekar Siddula
Sai Sreekar Siddula
@sai_rogigonu
5 months ago

The macro lens is great! You can get really close and see a lot of detail

Abhinav Singh
Abhinav Singh
@abhinav_ketibupi
4 months ago

vivo V50 is definitely worth the hype

Reply
Anmol Matta
Anmol Matta
@ammy
4 months ago

The vivo V50 is surprisingly good

Reply
Vishal Sharma
Vishal Sharma
@vishal_noralupe
4 months ago

Vivo V50 ki audio quality mast hai

Reply
Brij Thakur
Brij Thakur
@brij_gavuseti
5 months ago

Selfies mein skin tones natural lagte hain vivo V50 se

Reply
Pratulya
Pratulya
@pratulya_ceriyamo
5 months ago

Vivo V50 is a good phone for everyday use

Reply
SURYA MUTLURI
SURYA MUTLURI
@surya_zamimaci
5 months ago

Performance also reno 13 best

Reply
SURYA MUTLURI
SURYA MUTLURI
@surya_zamimaci
5 months ago

RENO 13 Is best and reno13 had 4k with 60fps video recording

Reply

Related Products