MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor
$999.99 • View Prices • By MSI
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor price in United States starts from $999.99. It is available at lowest price on Newegg in United States as on Nov 15, 2025. Take a look at MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor detailed specifications and features.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Display | 31.5 inches |
- Compare
- Like
- Comment
- Share
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor price in United States is $999.99. You can get MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor for the lowest price at Newegg. MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor was last updated on November 15, 2025
Read More- Price History
- Set Price Alert
- View Prices
Features
- 31.5 in Display
- 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD)
- 1.07 B Colors
- Curved Monitor
- 1500000:1 (Typ) Contrast Ratio
- 1 x USB Type-C
- 1 x Display Port v1.4a
- 2 x HDMI v2.1
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Specs
General
- Form Factor: Curved
- Thickness: 123 mmThick
- 3 Year Warranty
Display
- QD-OLED Panel
- 31.5 inchesAverage
- 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD)Best
- 0.03 ms Response Time
- 240 Hz Refresh Rate
- 16:9 Aspect Ratio
- Anti Glare
- NVIDIA G-Sync
Connectivity
- 3 x USB 2.0, 1 x USB Type-C
- 2 x HDMI v2.1, 1 x Display Port v1.4a
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Prices
Price has not changed significantly in 1 month.
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Price History
You can check the price history of MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor below. The current price is $999.99. Over the past month, there has been a decrease of $2 in the price.
Read MoreLoading Price History ...
Discuss
Be the first to leave a comment.
Related Monitors
Related Searches
Compared With
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor vs Asus ROG Strix XG32UCWMG 32 inch Ultra HD 4K OLED Gaming Monitor
LG UltraGear 32GP750-B 32 inch Quad HD Gaming Monitor vs LG 27UK850-W 27-inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor
HP Series 5 527sa 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs HP Series 5 527sh 27 inch Full HD Monitor
Dell P2725H 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs BenQ GW2786TC 27 inch Full HD Monitor
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 LS27DG600SUXEN 27 inch Quad HD Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF LS27FG602SNXZA 27 inch Quad HD QD-OLED Gaming Monitor
HP E27 G5 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs HP Series 5 527sw 27 inch Full HD MonitorMSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Full Specs
General
| Model | MPG 32C1URX QD-OLED |
| Dimensions | 714 x 423 x 123 mm |
| Depth with Stand | 318 mm |
| Height with Stand | 473 mm |
| Weight with Stand | 8.4 kg |
| Panel Type | QD-OLED |
| Form Factor | Curved |
| Warranty | 3 years Warranty |
Display
| Size | 31.5 inches |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Anti Glare Screen | Yes |
| Features | VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400, 1700R Curvature |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD) |
| Max Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| Contrast Ratio | 1500000:1 (Typ) |
| Response Time | 0.03 ms |
| Brightness | 250 nits (SDR), 450 nits (HDR), 1000 nits (Peak) |
| Adaptive Sync | Yes, NVIDIA G-Sync |
| Number of Colors | 1.07 B |
| Color Gamut | 98% Adobe RGB, 99% DCI-P3, 138% sRGB |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle | 178 ° |
| Vertical Viewing Angle | 178 ° |
Connectivity
| USB Ports | 1 x USB Type-C, 3 x USB 2.0 |
| USB Port Details | 1 x USB Type-C (DisplayPort, 90W Power Delivery), 2 x USB 2.0 Type-A (Downstream), 1 x USB 2.0 Type-B (Upstream) |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
| Display Port | 1 x Display Port v1.4a |
| HDMI | 2 x HDMI v2.1 Port |
Extra
| Sales Package | Monitor, Stand, 1 x HDMI Cable (2.1), 1 x DisplayPort Cable (1.4a), 1 x Power Cord (C13), 1 x Quick Guide, 1 x USB Type-B to A Cable, 4 x VESA Wall Mount Screw |
| Other Features | Frameless Design, PiP/PbP Support, Height Adjustable. Swivel & Pivot Support |
| Stand Tilt | -5°~15° |
| Wall Mounting | 100 x 100 mm |
| HDCP Support | Yes |
Disclaimer: Despite our best efforts, we can't guarantee that the information on this page including the price, specs and images is 100% correct. We may get a commission for qualifying sales through our links.