




BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor
$599.99 • View Prices • By BenQ
BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor price in United States starts from $599.99. It is available at lowest price on Amazon in United States as on Nov 15, 2025. Take a look at BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor detailed specifications and features.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Display | 31.5 inches |
- Compare
- Like
- Comment
- Share
BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor price in United States is $599.99. You can get BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor for the lowest price at Amazon. BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor was last updated on November 15, 2025
Read More- Price History
- Set Price Alert
- View Prices
Features
- 31.5 in Display
- 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD)
- 1.07 B Colors
- Flat Monitor
- 1000:1 Contrast Ratio
- 3 x USB Type-C
- Display Port v1.4
- HDMI 2.0
BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor Specs
General
- LED Monitor
- Form Factor: Flat
- Thickness: 85.24 mmAverage
- 6.2 kgHeavy
- 3 Year Warranty
Display
- IPS Panel
- 31.5 inchesAverage
- 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD)Good
- ~ 140 PPIAverage
- 5 ms Response Time
- 60 Hz Refresh Rate
- 16:9 Aspect Ratio
- Anti Glare
Connectivity
- 3 x USB Type-C
- HDMI 2.0, Display Port v1.4, Audio Out
- Speaker Inbuilt
BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor Prices
4% (price dropped by $21 in one month)
BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor Price History
You can check the price history of BenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor below. The current price is $599.99. Over the past month, there has been a decrease of $21 in the price.
Read MoreLoading Price History ...
Discuss
Be the first to leave a comment.
Related Monitors
Related Searches
Compared With

Dell P2725H 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs BenQ GW2790Q 27 inch Quad HD Monitor
HP E27 G5 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs HP Series 5 527sw 27 inch Full HD Monitor
LG 27U631A-B 27 inch Quad HD Monitor vs BenQ GW2790Q 27 inch Quad HD Monitor
BenQ GW2790Q 27 inch Quad HD Monitor vs HP Series 5 527sh 27 inch Full HD Monitor
Dell P2725H 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs BenQ GW2786TC 27 inch Full HD Monitor
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 LS27DG600SUXEN 27 inch Quad HD Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF LS27FG602SNXZA 27 inch Quad HD QD-OLED Gaming MonitorBenQ PD3205U 32-inch Ultra HD 4K LED Monitor Full Specs
General
| Model | PD3205U |
| Dimensions | 714.7 x 422 x 85.24 mm |
| Depth with Stand | 256.8 mm |
| Height with Stand | 589 mm |
| Weight | 6.2 kg |
| Weight with Stand | 9.4 kg |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Form Factor | Flat |
| Warranty | 3 years Warranty |
Display
| Size | 31.5 inches |
| PPI | ~ 140 PPI |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Anti Glare Screen | Yes |
| Features | HDR10 |
| Display Type | LED |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD) |
| Max Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Contrast Ratio | 1000:1 |
| Response Time | 5 ms |
| Brightness | 250 Nits (Typ), 350 nits (Peak, HDR) |
| Backlight | LED Backlight |
| Number of Colors | 1.07 B |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB, 99% Rec.709 |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle | 178 ° |
| Vertical Viewing Angle | 178 ° |
Connectivity
| USB Ports | 3 x USB Type-C, 2 x USB Type-A |
| USB Port Details | 2 x USB 3.2 Type-A (Downstream), 2 x USB Type-B (Upstream), 1 x USB Type-C (Downstream), 1 x USB 3.2 Type-C, 1 x USB Type-C(Power Delivery 90W, DisplayPort Alt Mode, Data) |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
| Other Ports | 1 x Hotkey Puck Port |
| Display Port | Display Port v1.4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 Port |
| Audio Out | Yes |
Input
| Speakers | 2 x 2.5W |
Extra
| Other Features | KVM Switch, Auto Pivot, Dual View, Uniformity Technology, PIP/PBP, ICCsync |
| Stand Tilt | -5˚~20˚ |
| Wall Mounting | 100 x 100 mm |
| HDCP Support | Yes |
| Language Support | Arabic, Chinese (simplified), Chinese (traditional), Czech, Deutsch, English, French, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Netherlands, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish |
Disclaimer: Despite our best efforts, we can't guarantee that the information on this page including the price, specs and images is 100% correct. We may get a commission for qualifying sales through our links.
















