





BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor
$2,099.99 • Out Of Stock • By BenQ
BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor price in United States starts from $2,099.99. It was available at lowest price on Amazon in United States as on Dec 29, 2025. Take a look at BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor detailed specifications and features.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Display | 31.5 inches |
- Compare
- Like
- Comment
- Share
This Monitor is Out of Stock.
Set an Alert to know when it comes back in stock.
Set an Alert to know when it comes back in stock.
$2,099.99
Search
BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor price in United States is $2,099.99. You can get BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor for the lowest price at Amazon. BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor was last updated on December 29, 2025
Read MoreFeatures
- 31.5 in Display
- 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD)
- 1.07 B Colors
- Flat Monitor
- 1000:1 Contrast Ratio
- 1 x USB Type-C
- 1 x Display Port v1.4
- 2 x HDMI v2.0
OUT OF STOCK
BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Specs
General
- Form Factor: Flat
- Thickness: 77.8 mmAverage
- 9.1 kgHeavy
- 3 Year Warranty
Display
- IPS Panel
- 31.5 inchesAverage
- 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD)Best
- ~ 137 PPILow
- 5 ms Response Time
- 60 Hz Refresh Rate
- 16:9 Aspect Ratio
- Anti Glare
Connectivity
- 1 x USB Type-C
- 2 x HDMI v2.0, 1 x Display Port v1.4
BenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Prices
Price has not changed significantly in 1 month.
Discuss
Be the first to leave a comment.
Related Monitors
Related Searches
Compared With

Alienware AW2725DM 27 inch Quad HD Gaming Monitor vs Asus TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A 27 inch Quad HD Gaming Monitor
Asus TUF Gaming VG279Q5A 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs LG UltraGear 24GN60R 24 inch Full HD Gaming Monitor
Asus TUF Gaming VG279Q5A 27 inch Full HD Monitor vs LG Ultragear 27G411A-B 27 inch Full HD Gaming Monitor
MSI MAG 271QP QD-OLED X28 27 inch Quad HD Gaming Monitor vs LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B 27 inch Quad HD OLED Gaming Monitor
MSI MAG 274QF X24 27 inch Quad HD Gaming Monitor vs Gigabyte GS27QA 27 inch Quad HD Gaming Monitor
LG UltraGear 27GX704A-B 27 inch Quad HD OLED Gaming Monitor vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF LS27FG602SNXZA 27 inch Quad HD QD-OLED Gaming MonitorBenQ SW321C 32 inch Ultra HD 4K Monitor Full Specs
General
| Model | SW321C |
| Dimensions | 747.2 x 448.2 x 77.8 mm |
| Depth with Stand | 285.3 mm |
| Height with Stand | 652.7 mm |
| Weight | 9.1 kg |
| Weight with Stand | 12.6 kg |
| Panel Type | IPS |
| Form Factor | Flat |
| Warranty | 3 years Warranty |
Display
| Size | 31.5 inches |
| PPI | ~ 137 PPI |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
| Anti Glare Screen | Yes |
| Features | HDR10, HLG |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K UHD) |
| Max Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| Contrast Ratio | 1000:1 |
| Response Time | 5 ms |
| Brightness | 250 nits |
| Backlight | LED Backlight |
| Number of Colors | 1.07 B |
| Color Gamut | 100% sRGB, 95% P3, 99% Adobe RGB |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle | 178 ° |
| Vertical Viewing Angle | 178 ° |
Connectivity
| USB Ports | 1 x USB Type-C, 2 x USB Type-A |
| USB Port Details | 1 x USB Type-C, 1 x USB Type-B (Upstream), 2 x USB 3.1 Type-A (Downstrema) |
| Headphone Jack | Yes |
| Other Ports | 1 x Card Reader |
| Display Port | 1 x Display Port v1.4 |
| HDMI | 2 x HDMI v2.0 Port |
Extra
| Sales Package | Monitor, Power Cable, mDP to DP Cable, HDMI (v2.0) Cable, USB 3.0 Cable, USB C Cable, Warranty Card, Calibration Report, Shading Hood (landscape and portrait), Hotkey Puck G2, Quick Start Guide |
| Other Features | Height Adjustable, Swivel & Pivot Support, Paper Color Sync, Palette Master Ultimate, PiP/PbP, Hardware Calibration |
| Stand Tilt | -5˚~20˚ |
| Wall Mounting | 100 x 100 mm |
| HDCP Support | Yes |
| Language Support | Arabic, Chinese (simplified), Chinese (traditional), Czech, Deutsch, English, French, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Netherlands, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish |
Disclaimer: Despite our best efforts, we can't guarantee that the information on this page including the price, specs and images is 100% correct. We may get a commission for qualifying sales through our links.
















